Hours per search
120 hrs
Baseline. Fully human-led.
Autonomy level
L0 shadow
AI watches, humans decide
Timeline
Now
Current operating state
Efficiency vs baseline
0% reduction
What gets built
Core infrastructure and integrations. Loxo CRM as the system of record. LinkedIn, Juicebox and Metaview wired up. Search intake workflow standardised. Candidate data schema defined. GDPR consent layer in place. The plumbing everything else runs on.
Moat building
Venture partner network begins compounding. Every search adds placement outcome data. Client relationships anchored to Force, not individual partners. The data that will train every future agent starts accumulating now.
Agents
Sourcing Agent (shadow)
Categorization Agent
Matching Agent
Engagement Agent
Pre-Vetting Agent
Nurture Agent
Sage (Orchestrator)
Moat strength
Placement data1
Partner network3
Client lock-in1
Candidate graph1
Speed advantage2
Hours per search
72 hrs
40% reduction vs baseline
Autonomy level
L1 recommend
AI recommends, human approves
Timeline
Months 3–9
Active build phase
Efficiency vs baseline
40% reduction
What gets built
Sourcing Agent goes live, pulling and ranking candidate pools autonomously. Categorization Agent classifies seniority, domain and function. Matching Agent scores candidates against search criteria with a confidence threshold. WhatsApp outreach sequencing via Engagement Agent. Operators shift from doing to reviewing.
Moat building
Matching model starts training on real placement outcomes. Every operator override teaches the system. Sourcing coverage expands beyond what any human researcher can reach. Speed gap versus traditional search widens from days to hours.
Agents
Sourcing Agent
Categorization Agent
Matching Agent (L1)
Engagement Agent (building)
Pre-Vetting Agent
Nurture Agent
Sage (Orchestrator)
Moat strength
Placement data3
Partner network4
Client lock-in2
Candidate graph3
Speed advantage4
Hours per search
40 hrs
67% reduction vs baseline
Autonomy level
L2 execute
AI acts, human spot-checks
Timeline
Month 9–18
Scale and calibrate
Efficiency vs baseline
67% reduction
What gets built
Pre-Vetting Agent conducts multi-turn candidate conversations autonomously across WhatsApp and web. Nurture Agent activates for long-term candidate relationship management. Client-facing platform launches with live search transparency. Sage orchestrator begins coordinating agents end-to-end. Benchpark v1 goes live as a subscription product.
Moat building
Client platform creates switching cost. Benchpark candidates are now warm relationships, not cold names — a dataset nobody else has. Pre-vetting conversations produce a proprietary candidate behaviour dataset that improves matching accuracy with every search closed.
Agents
Sourcing Agent
Categorization Agent
Matching Agent (L2)
Engagement Agent
Pre-Vetting Agent (L1)
Nurture Agent (building)
Sage Orchestrator (building)
Moat strength
Placement data5
Partner network5
Client lock-in5
Candidate graph5
Speed advantage6
Hours per search
18 hrs
85% reduction vs baseline
Autonomy level
L3 autonomous
AI runs, human audits
Timeline
Year 2–3
Platform maturity
Efficiency vs baseline
85% reduction
What gets built
Sage fully orchestrates searches end-to-end with minimal human touchpoints. Matching confidence threshold drops from 80% to 60% as the model matures on placement data. Voice-based pre-vetting goes live. Benchpark scales to multi-client succession planning. Market intelligence layer surfaces compensation and talent movement data for clients in real time.
Moat building
Data flywheel is now self-reinforcing. More searches improve matching, better matching wins more mandates, more mandates generate more data. Network effects kick in across clients, candidates and partners. At this scale, Force can run more concurrent searches per operator than any traditional firm can manage in a month.
Agents
Sourcing Agent (L3)
Categorization Agent (L3)
Matching Agent (L3)
Engagement Agent (L2)
Pre-Vetting Agent (L2)
Nurture Agent (L2)
Sage Orchestrator (L2)
Moat strength
Placement data8
Partner network7
Client lock-in7
Candidate graph8
Speed advantage9
Hours per search
6 hrs
95% reduction vs baseline
Autonomy level
L4 self-improving
AI optimises its own parameters
Timeline
Year 3+
Category-defining state
Efficiency vs baseline
95% reduction
What gets built
Agents optimise their own confidence thresholds based on cumulative placement outcomes. Force's dataset of candidate behaviour, market signals and placement results becomes an asset in its own right. Benchpark evolves into a full talent intelligence subscription. The operating system can run dozens of concurrent searches with a fraction of the headcount of a traditional firm.
Moat building
At this stage the moat is structural. Years of proprietary placement data, warm candidate relationships and client embeddedness create a compounding advantage that cannot be bought or replicated quickly. Force is not a search firm that uses technology. It is the technology, with expert humans as the quality gate that clients trust and competitors cannot automate.
Agents
Sourcing Agent (L4)
Categorization Agent (L3)
Matching Agent (L4)
Engagement Agent (L3)
Pre-Vetting Agent (L3)
Nurture Agent (L3)
Sage Orchestrator (L4)
Moat strength
Placement data10
Partner network8
Client lock-in9
Candidate graph10
Speed advantage10